Sherlock Holmes (
could_be_dangerous) wrote in
maskormenace2015-03-07 01:47 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- hiro hamada | n/a,
- † ash crimson | n/a,
- † benton fraser | n/a,
- † bruce wayne | batman,
- † cadel greeniaus | stormer,
- † conan edogawa | n/a,
- † dorian gray | n/a,
- † frederick chilton | chief of staff!!,
- † john watson | n/a,
- † kate bishop | hawkeye,
- † kay faraday | great thief yatagarasu,
- † kitty jones | n/a,
- † maedhros | gwestbarthant,
- † mary watson | chímaira,
- † melkor | n/a,
- † sherlock holmes | n/a
#001; text
In light of recent events it seems apt that I make an advertisement offering my services to the general public. I am Sherlock Holmes, consulting detective, amply acquainted with the solution of murders, thefts, arsons, and the generally unsavoury, etc. Inquiries of a general nature may be directed to me at any time, though I take cases at my own discretion, and will generally request an interview to establish both the particulars and the legitimacy of the case. The suspicious may refer to Dr. John Watson for a no-doubt superfluously effusive list of my general accomplishments, and when he proves unconvincing I should be delighted to provide a demonstration of my capabilities. In what will no doubt be vastly more appealing than any of the previous to some of you, I shall add that all services will be rendered entirely gratis.
((ooc: Permissions post/opt-out here, for anything you'd rather Sherlock not pick up on. Additionally, there may be some threadjacking here and there by the aforementioned Dr. Watson since it is his lot in life to babysit this gigantic infant, and if anyone would like to address him instead of Sherlock they can note as much in their subject lines.))
((ooc: Permissions post/opt-out here, for anything you'd rather Sherlock not pick up on. Additionally, there may be some threadjacking here and there by the aforementioned Dr. Watson since it is his lot in life to babysit this gigantic infant, and if anyone would like to address him instead of Sherlock they can note as much in their subject lines.))
no subject
SH
no subject
no subject
In fact, I hardly see why we need to stop there. Your irregular use of punctuation along with your word choice, while not infallible indicators of age, suggest to me that you're in your mid-twenties at the latest, probably female. Certainly English; 'spot of bother' isn't common parlance in North American dialects. You're disinclined to trust; you've stated as much outright and yet you're either disinclined to approach others critically or you require more data to do so, which I am helpfully providing you by rising to the implicit challenge and demonstrating what I can do. Only a handful of words and I already have a sense of you; do you imagine I couldn't do more if given more?
Spots of bother are to be expected; I count on it and provision myself accordingly. The only thing that remains remotely obscure is why you care, though one may make a number of reasonable guesses as to that, too.
SH
no subject
But she reins in her emotions. She answers with brittle politeness. ]
Nothing you have said is incorrect, Mr Holmes - with the exception of one thing.
no subject
SH
no subject
no subject
You needn't be marginally clever to mistrust what I say out of hand, of course, but all the same I should add that I have no taste for blackmail and less fondness still for blackmailers.
SH
no subject
and that's why this next response takes about an hour to come ]
Maybe not. Maybe you're being completely honest when you say you're simply doing it from boredom. After all, you're OBVIOUSLY ridiculously posh - your accent just about SCREAMS poshness. Not that you even need to hear your accent to tell. After all, only someone used to people bowing and scraping and cooing would get so spiky when anyone is bold enough to challenge him. And it's posh men like you who always assume you're the cleverest person in the room - not because you are, but just because no one's going to speak up to contradict you. And then there's the bit with you turning up your nose at the police not being so clever as you - so you're the sort of person who isn't either afraid of the police or aware of the necessity of them, meaning you've doubtless never had to either rely on or run from them. So, yeah. Posh. And since it's only rich idiots who'd give away work for free when they could charge for it, I guess maybe you really are being honest.
But you know - just for your consideration - there are other sorts of cleverness aside from yours. I'll bet you I can outwit you in three different ways, but you'd be too stuck in your own definition of cleverness to even recognize it.
[ look she's trying hard to be mean and smart in the same way you are
and doing...okay...at it
also hahaha the part where she's all "only posh people get all mad at being challenged" ]
video until stated otherwise; private
I'd advise you to watch that inferiority complex except it takes a truly astonishing amount of arrogance to suggest that I require your personal approval to save lives. It hardly matters where you're wrong about me; if I were you I'd be more careful about where you're wrong about you.
[He pauses, considering.]
What really astonishes me, though, is that in spite of all your invective you seem to be labouring under the impression that I've never been told to piss off before.
video likewise; private
You haven't. Not really. When someone like you gets told to piss off, it's deferential. I know how your sort gets treated.
[ And then, with a sardonic sort of smile: ]
But now it's about saving lives, is it? If it's about saving lives, I'll apologize. But you said it was boredom.
no subject
My sort.
[The words are spoken with careful emphasis and accompanied by a small smile.]
If you mean the wealthy I'm afraid I only have the benefit of a good birth; before I came here I live in a modest flat I could only afford as the landlady owed me a favour and cut the rates, and even then only with a flatshare. I might just as easily have slept on park benches; the circumstances are largely irrelevant as long as I have the work, so perhaps that's what you mean, my sort. The neurologically atypical. Madmen. Or maybe you mean addicts; I'm begging for work I'm willing to accept without pay; obviously I'm looking to distract myself from something. People don't defer to madmen; the police don't defer to anyone they'd just as soon arrest as hire. I am permitted because I have made myself both insufferable and invaluable. I get results. What happens to go through my head while I'm in the process of getting them only matters to someone looking for excuses to deride me because I don't think the way they do.
no subject
I meant rude people, actually. Because you were ridiculously rude to me with no reason. So please don't do that again.
[ And then a little sigh. ]
Look - if you really do save lives, then yeah, okay. That's what matters. But you know that it almost never happens that people offer something for nothing. You know that it's logical to be suspicious.
no subject
[There a crooked smile, which even seems genuine, though it doesn't look quite right, as though he's not used to smiling when he actually means to.]
You're not wrong about me either. I have a poor metric for rude. I am abrasive, unappreciative, ignorant, arrogant, and overeducated. Given that poor metric for rudeness, I could be wrong, but I wouldn't call the implication that I'm being exploitative no reason.
[A pause, a toss of the head akin to a shrug.]
Though I am.
no subject
Being exploitative?
no subject
no subject
Well, then it's a little funny to get angry with me for accusing you of it, isn't it? Even if I was suspecting you of worse motives than you have.
[ But even so, a moment later, she shakes her head and says: ]
I am sorry for accusing you right out. I ought to have been more tactful. I'm sorry.
no subject
Please. Tact is a waste of time and apologies are nearly as bad. I object to the comparison because the most reprehensible creatures I've ever known were blackmailers, and as one of the best was a garroter I suppose it's fair to say my standards aren't high.
no subject
Sorry. The worst were blackmailers? I should think there's quite a lot of things people can do that are much worse than blackmail.
no subject
[He presses his lips together and raises his eyebrows, shrugging. What can you do?]
I would estimate that Magnussen's body count was in the hundreds, speaking conservatively, due to his tendency to meddle in international affairs alone. He found it funny, being able to do whatever he liked to whomever he liked, and he knew that he could because he knew that regardless of the facts, whatever he chose to publish would be read and absorbed and believed by millions. Newspapers are good as gospel.
no subject
I've known plenty with much higher body counts than that. The average army recruiter, for one. Or the head of police. Or our Prime Minister. I don't see much wrong with the sort of man who'd target those sorts of people. Nothing wrong with making the wealthy and powerful afraid.
[ But that's...glib. She gives a little sigh, shakes her head: ]
I see your point, I guess. Blackmail can be awful. All right.
no subject
[There the point of divergence and there the reason he objects -- Sherlock works at avoiding cruelty when he's bored, however often he fails. Magnussen had embraced it, elevated it to machinery, an art form. His achievement was impressive; no denying that. All the same, Sherlock has spent enough of his time trying to be a person to know what it's like to be forced to be something one is not. There has been enough isolation, enough hopelessness that he recoils at the willing and gleeful imposition of it upon others.]
I'm intimately acquainted with the failings of the police and of governments. Rarely do the individuals comprising them present the same knowing sadism; theirs are mostly crimes of ignorance.
no subject
If you think that, you must not know them that well, then.
no subject
no subject