Nor would I, though I'm perfectly willing, if that is what it comes to.
Again, though, the central issue is this: it won't be safe in such a circumstance, but nor will anything else. If the tides look to be turning that way, attempts can be made to liquidate the fund. But putting a stop to it merely because it is no safer than anything else...It's akin to refusing to build an airport because it's not designed to withstand a bombing. One cannot put a halt to peacetime projects merely because there is a possibility of war - and, moreover, what buildings can withstand being bombed?
text.
Again, though, the central issue is this: it won't be safe in such a circumstance, but nor will anything else. If the tides look to be turning that way, attempts can be made to liquidate the fund. But putting a stop to it merely because it is no safer than anything else...It's akin to refusing to build an airport because it's not designed to withstand a bombing. One cannot put a halt to peacetime projects merely because there is a possibility of war - and, moreover, what buildings can withstand being bombed?