[ He takes this as a serious question and considers it. ]
I suppose it would be like the square and rectangle thing. Logic. You know, how every square is a rectangle but not every rectangle is a square? So all sufficiently advanced technology is magic, but not all magic is sufficiently advanced technology?
I guess it would depend on why you're asking the question. If you're a human who's trying to figure stuff out, it'd be a really important distinction. If you're just trying to categorize, it'd be arbitrary.
no subject
I suppose it would be like the square and rectangle thing. Logic. You know, how every square is a rectangle but not every rectangle is a square? So all sufficiently advanced technology is magic, but not all magic is sufficiently advanced technology?
I guess it would depend on why you're asking the question. If you're a human who's trying to figure stuff out, it'd be a really important distinction. If you're just trying to categorize, it'd be arbitrary.