by_candlelight: (Default)
Ruby Nakamura ([personal profile] by_candlelight) wrote in [community profile] maskormenace2019-11-28 08:30 pm

ANONYMOUS

So. I not seen anyone say yet and that's real bullshit. But I personnnally am thankful as fuck that we had some people willing to ignroe the highers-ups who insisted 'Let's keep the twins as as far away as possible' ad brought the twins to Jeopardy. Chances are we would be 100^ fucked otherwise.

So here's a shout out to those among us who both had the power to go against the main guysand weren't too chickenshit or stuck with their heads fucked upped their own metahorical ass to do so.



[ Ruby isn't trying to stir shit, per se, but she makes the post knowing full damn well it might. It is nearly midnight when she posts, and she is sleep-deprivation drunk, and it really does seem like a much better way to go about thanking the people who saved their asses, than, say, messaging them personally. She also really hopes she used all the curses correctly.

She will possibly regret this come morning. The typos, if not the message itself. ]
kamala_khan: (Default)

[personal profile] kamala_khan 2019-11-29 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
Hey we're here and alive so I kind of have to agree with you on this one.
kamala_khan: (Default)

Re: ANONYMOUS

[personal profile] kamala_khan 2019-12-04 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
They did do a good job.
timetravelandguns: (Default)

text

[personal profile] timetravelandguns 2019-11-29 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Heh. I like your style.
timetravelandguns: (Default)

text

[personal profile] timetravelandguns 2019-12-02 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I think being moral is still important, but I think you are pretty cool for saying this.
timetravelandguns: (Uhm)

Re: text

[personal profile] timetravelandguns 2019-12-02 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that is a question that ha to be weighed every time.

Sometimes, the answer is clear, and sometimes not.

Being sure of your answer, and knowing where you stand is important, though.
timetravelandguns: (Oh?)

text

[personal profile] timetravelandguns 2019-12-02 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Admittedly, I wasn't there, where the decisions were made, and admittedly, I do not know what the Fates ideas or decisions were based on.

But I think you are making some assumptions.

We have no idea whether or not the other idea would have been accepted, because it did not have to be. Two people who others decided had to be who would be chosen were brought in, despite others attempting to save those people from that choice.

We do not at this time, and probably never will know whether or not the Fates would have been willing to go with the Imports who were willing sacrifices or not. Because it was never given a chance.
timetravelandguns: (Bright)

text

[personal profile] timetravelandguns 2019-12-03 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, no offense, but, unless it was revealed somewhere I did not see, we do not know if the twins were taken because they were the only ones acceptable, or because they happened to be there. We literally do not know this answer. You are making assumptions.

Gods have a tendency to say a lot of things, and often those words are not direct, and when they are direct, they are lies. Having dealt with gods before, I can tell you that they can be fooled, and they often want things other than what they actually say.

I think you are taking a dim view of their motivations. Saying 'I was willing to let the universe be destroyed because', instead of 'I was willing to try and take a chance on saving these children even in the face of destruction'.

Your way of putting it is one point of view, but it is hardly the truth entire.
timetravelandguns: (Angry)

Private, text

[personal profile] timetravelandguns 2019-12-03 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not saying your outlook is less valid. I am saying as yet, it is based on a set of assumptions. It is never 'safe to say'anything when it comes to Fates, gods, or powers that be. Making that a standard is an easy way to destroy not just a world, but an entire timeline, or more than one.

I've met the fates, and I've met gods. My experience does not jive with yours at all.

And again, you change the words to make it worse, to make it more weighted in the direction you want it to be, the negative one. Argue all you want, but do it honestly. Don't change the words your opponent uses in order to alter the intent and to lean that intent the way you see it.

In the worst moments, in the last second of death, or life, or something worse? Our morals and what we believe in is the only thing that matters. As long as we are willing to learn, and grow, and change, those things are the single most important parts of us.

In the end, your argument is not valid, while your opinion is. Your argument is still entirely made on assumptions. Assumptions that you keep trying to insist are the most likely ones, the most heavily weighted toward being the right ones. Until that changes, I see no reason to continue this at all.

If you ever do, I would be willing to continue. Until then. Goodbye.
pillz: (take cover)

text;

[personal profile] pillz 2019-12-02 03:40 am (UTC)(link)
2nded. are you tryin 2 make our big neighborhood heroes feel bad?
pillz: (lmao)

[personal profile] pillz 2019-12-05 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
any leotards yell at you yet
pillz: (hay)

[personal profile] pillz 2019-12-05 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
cool. nobody come after you in person, did they? if they do, there are other leotards who will stick up for you. let me know
pillz: (lounging (ladyfriend))

[personal profile] pillz 2019-12-07 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
if it makes you feel better, there are plenty of supes in this town who would do it all again the exact same way.

but there is always gonna be people like us 2. to unfuck them & they great principles
pillz: (mild)

[personal profile] pillz 2019-12-09 06:30 am (UTC)(link)
that's what temawork is for, baby. you're welcome in the choir of reason.

and maybe that shit won't happen again. a guy can hope.
Edited (lmao conflated our threads, i'm sorry.) 2019-12-09 06:43 (UTC)