restingstitchface: (Interest)
Jonathan Crane ([personal profile] restingstitchface) wrote in [community profile] maskormenace2015-11-08 10:27 pm

10 ⚜ Audio

[Anyone who's familiar with Crane will recognize his compulsive need to study fear. But what's the curious thing, here? His approach. His voice is as soft and calm as it had been upon his arrival. It gives an impression of frailty that's deliberately misleading. There was nothing about him that sounded like the Scarecrow. And that's the frightening thing.]

Machiavelli once said, "And here comes in the question whether it is better to be loved rather than feared, or feared rather than loved. It might perhaps be answered that we should wish to be both; but since love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved."

I put his question to you all; is it better to be loved rather than feared, or feared rather than loved?

[He likes the idea of letting the piddling powers in this place believe he's behaving himself; listening to that silly therapist he'd encountered recently. Maybe his audience all be dishonest in their answers. Frightened. Scared. He indulges in a smile. He will have to confirm all of their opinions with an experiment, of course.]
glowsferatu: rude (pic#6499825)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-09 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Not self-loathing or insecurity, necessarily. But less delusion and hypocrisy.

It's one thing to confidently settle oneself into the garbage can, but quite another to treat it as a palace, and to pretend that any other accommodation makes its resident a fool.
glowsferatu: glow, rude (pic#5041720)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-10 11:38 am (UTC)(link)
[ Hey, a horse is cooler than a gavel. ]

That itself is the delusion, that you think you don't look the fool either way. Thinking you've come out of it otherwise makes you more the fool.
glowsferatu: sad, thought (Ready To Be Heartbroken)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-10 12:31 pm (UTC)(link)
[ Symbols of power always gotta be so phallic, what's the deal with that? ]

If the word is in any way applicable to the circumstances we're discussing, then it has truly become meaningless.

Some things go beyond opinion, or, at least, beyond the single individual opinion you're dismissing. I have to wonder how much less wrong you think it makes you every time a new one to dismiss presents itself to you.
glowsferatu: human, thought (pic#7577279)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-11 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
You aren't wrong purely by nature of being in the minority, that's more a symptom of it. It only shows that you have no interest in being anything other than wrong, that you have no ambition beyond such blatant foolishness.

Let's take your opening question as an example, since you've ignored my point about Machiavelli's intention. Believing fear is safer is self-sabotage in the making! It supposes that fear can only inspire inaction, when you should know from experience just how easily it can lead to the opposite. People hate what they fear, and in enough numbers, they won't hesitate to destroy the source.
glowsferatu: porrim, thought (pic#6650708)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-12 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
There you go again, talking as if you're some inscrutable, misunderstood genius, and not an insufferable and petty little man. I can believe that you know many things, Mr. Crane, but you certainly don't understand very much, least of all people.

I think you only know how to inspire one or two different reactions, so you've convinced yourself that you must be brilliant after the fact, that it's what you always meant to do.
glowsferatu: rude, glow (pic#6650709)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-14 03:24 am (UTC)(link)
You way you enjoy yourself is a crime, you'd think your incarceration might have clued you in to that fact.

Arguments of nature are a weak attempt to deflect responsibility, and shouldn't be attempted if you can't argue it with any consistency. You can't "go against the natural" while also "only acting the way you were made." They're mutually exclusive.

If you can't live without restraining yourself, it isn't about calling or destiny, it's about being weak. If I were to "only act the way I was made", then I would tear out whichever throat was closest when I get hungry. Their blood would be mine by right, if I were to see the world that way.

What you're claiming isn't any sort of advanced or revolutionary idea. It isn't bravery or intellect to deny and defy the basic tenets of civilization. It's devolution. You've regressed backwards and haven't even realized it. That isn't meaning, it's delusion.
Edited 2015-11-14 03:24 (UTC)
glowsferatu: rude (Talking Trash Under Your Breath)

[personal profile] glowsferatu 2015-11-16 12:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Not cannot. Will not. But a continued refusal to accept responsibility is no surprise from you.

Furthermore, my masochistic tendencies are well-documented and fully acknowledged, trying to make mention of them doesn't indicate any degree of insight on your part, it only demonstrates that your eyes are working. There had been some doubt on that!

But I'm sorry, I should know by now that having to think about anything unrelated to either fear or your misplaced superiority complex leaves you flaccid.