Laurie Collins (
fridgeflower) wrote in
maskormenace2017-10-29 11:31 pm
Entry tags:
text;
I started thinking on whether Monster Romance is still a thing, so far as being a YA (or regular A??) sub-genre goes. T'is the season, I guess.
Anyway, I now have a question for the masses.
Which Monster Boy and/or Girl would you date?
There's a saturation on the market of vampires and werewolves, and probably demons, but there's a pretty wide selection of spooky love interests that haven't gotten a lot of literary attention.
Please include your list of pros and cons for your selected Monster Mate.
Anyway, I now have a question for the masses.
Which Monster Boy and/or Girl would you date?
There's a saturation on the market of vampires and werewolves, and probably demons, but there's a pretty wide selection of spooky love interests that haven't gotten a lot of literary attention.
Please include your list of pros and cons for your selected Monster Mate.

no subject
every monster is sexy in its own way
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
not here
not here
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I'm just trying to deduce their own ways based on popular opinion.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Yetis would be a pretty good option, I think. Beards are so fashionable these days, and they're 99% beard.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
no subject
Could they end up brackish? Or is a one way or the other sort of thing?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text.
ghosts won't like bite you and eat you
Re: text.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text.
I suppose it would be a very spiritual relationship, which plenty of people would find perfectly nice.
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
2/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text.
Yeah, there's a few other things ghosts won't do, as well.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
text;
And is he immortal?
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
text;
...
...
...
Re: text;
text;
Re: text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
Re: text;
text;
Re: text;
text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
Re: text;
Re: text;
Re: text;
Re: text;
Re: text;
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
not worth the hassle
the headless horseman, maybe?
you'd always win arguments
photos would be awkward tho
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
That may depend on your history and luck, however.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text
[ THIS IS NEWS TO HIM. ]
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
text
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
NOT HERE
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
[ Says the guy who is technically a fantasy creature himself. ]
text;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; username: warlock
text; username: warlock
I'm counting them! Maybe I'll re-specify and say 'supernatural beings.'
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
no subject
As for what monster I would sleep with? I'm going with fairies.
no subject
And, yes. The Jersey Devil is definitely headed to the shelves. They seem to be a popular choice.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Text
Text
At this rate, we'll have to set up non-human speed dating.
Text
Text
Text
Text
Text;
...Or if you want to go the potentially creepy route, selkies.
Text;
Sea-farer?
Text;
Text;
Text;
Text;
Text;
Text;
Text;
Text;
Text;
no subject
no subject
Maybe authors are afraid of accidentally wandering into ambiguous (or less ambiguous) bestiality territory?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text;
You know who hasn't gotten enough attention in monster romance? Shapeshifters.
text;
But then, there ARE a lot of shapeshifting monsters and ghosts. They'd all qualify on their own.
Re: text;
text;
text;
text
The vampires I know are not like that. But I'm not sure I'd go with a demon either. They kinda feed off of desire and greed and that sort of thing. Or at least, mine did.
text
You've known a demon? How'd that turn out?
text