mathemagier: it is me (Smug bastard)

[personal profile] mathemagier 2016-03-20 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Well it's good to know that others are wondering along similar lines.
mathemagier: this is my predictive model- no touchie (Explain a thing)

[personal profile] mathemagier 2016-03-20 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
As it stands, the only ones I'd consider trusting would be the native-born therapists that aren't tied to the government. Difficult criteria to sort through unfortunately.

But it's that or risk a therapist with unknowable abilities. As they often seem to relate to discipline- at least so far as I've observed- I'd be incredibly wary even without the poor examples set before us.
driftsintobuffetline: (trying to explain)

[personal profile] driftsintobuffetline 2016-03-21 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed. It's the potential power thing that skeeves me out the most. Like, both Chilton and Crane are a little more than just OFF, and Crane has criminal history, but the thought that they could influence ones mind--because I know someone capable of that, and he's a good guy, and even the well-intentioned can use their influence wrongly at times.
mathemagier: intensely doesn't care (Zero fucks)

[personal profile] mathemagier 2016-03-21 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, but at least you can be sure they aren't telepaths.