Bow (
squadgoal) wrote in
maskormenace2019-10-01 04:44 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
- allison hargreeves | the rumor,
- armitage hux | starkiller,
- catra | n/a,
- conner kent | superboy,
- david alleyne | prodigy,
- david wayne loki | seeker of truth,
- harleen quinzel | harley quinn,
- john constantine | con man,
- luther hargreeves | space,
- rupert von hentzau | n/a,
- tyl regor | n/a,
- † anthony crowley | n/a,
- † bow | n/a,
- † flint marko | sandman,
- † marco | n/a,
- † rikki chadwick | n/a,
- † selina kyle | catwoman
( text | un: bow ) A SRS POLL
Hey, quick survey.
Bats vs Spiders, which is better?
Alternatively, are superhero names really necessary?
EDIT:
Spiders: 9
Bats: 10
Cats: 3
Wolverines???: 1
Bats vs Spiders, which is better?
Alternatively, are superhero names really necessary?
EDIT:
Spiders: 9
Bats: 10
Cats: 3
Wolverines???: 1
audio; un: Kaal Drellik
From what I have been able to glean from this planet's information network, spiders are clearly better at survival. They appeared before the other two by a considerable margin, and yet they're still here.
They're also the only one of your choices with venom, and that certainly has its charms.
Spiders.
no subject
Oookay. Adding one for spiders.
no subject
Now, was there a point to this? Or are these just the sort of questions that keep you up at night?
no subject
no subject
Especially alongside superhero names. Which I certainly cannot be of assistance for because the entire concept sounds ridiculous.
no subject
But that doesn't mean it's not valid to other people.