❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚❚ (
lambinated) wrote in
maskormenace2014-12-28 12:45 am
Entry tags:
COMM ID: HANS / ATTACHMENT

Best I can do. Censoring's not my work.
No luck finding the original either.
( OOC: There will be no responses. Characters are free to converse/speculate among each other! The post ID reads as Hans.
For those having difficulty viewing the above image on mobile or other devices, someone was kind enough to provide a TEXT FRIENDLY version! )

no subject
Possession doesn't necessarily mean that he's in control all the time.
But it'd explain a lot of things.
no subject
i also dont miss the irony in it being used almost exclusively when i point out how narrowly focused you are on a single facet
its entirely possible that your theory is true
but it would only be part of the truth
there are too many pieces missing
like how it would fit with quismas recorded appearance in 2007
or his appearance at the procession in september for that matter
the smoking has already been indicated as something worth looking at yes
but how did the hornets know that
did they actually know it or was what now looks like a clue just an idle comment
the ultimate problem is we dont know enough about quisma
and while we have plenty of reasons to have our suspicions we need to learn more before we can reach a legitimate conclusion
no subject
[Kate feels like that covers all of the points. But no, they don't know enough about Quisma. But it feels like the writing is on the wall when Clark's additions are made.]
no subject
but if his control wasnt total that actually makes the smoking odder
the captain must have continued it on his own if it lingered beyond quismas influence
we need to find ways to confirm this
or even if not confirm this particular theory then answers to the other questions it raises
its curious to consider that the first time he came to our attention is also the last time holiday appeared publicly
no subject
But that last one is a sticking point to me. I'm worried that that appearance may have also gotten the government's attention. That's just me worrying out loud, so don't take that as an attack or anything.
no subject
for the sake of argument assuming that is the case
according to mr kent his husband had however mentioned an episode in september that may have more likely brought him under scrutiny
though it is possible that something that occurred as a result of that appearance may have caused this episode
id be more skeptical that it came from the appearance itself
that said the most im sure they know of quismas visit to the memorial is what we imports have said about it
so if they did that wouldve been a good one on our parts
no subject
But no matter what it is, the one thing we can count on is that the government would know about Quisma's powers. Way better than us. That doesn't confirm or deny anything. In fact, it makes me wonder just how we should be looking at all of this.
no subject
and that somewhere in the mass of bureaucracy someone must have access to his file
who exactly that person might be isnt exactly a certainty
what conclusions they may have reached is similarly unclear
im honestly not sure i expect enough of them to think they may have drawn those lines if those lines are really there
if anything this could be the other side to keeping the flow of information so open
but keeping that flow is no less important for it
we May need to find some way to retain that openness in a more secure fashion
no subject
[She's asking because she'd love for their network to be private-run, but since the government is giving out the communicators, and it's hard to keep track of everyone new ...]
no subject
theres always pamphlets
[ being just slightly facetious. ]
no subject
Maybe someone can advocate for us taking over it, so that even the handed out communicators are ... well, already keyed in.
no subject
and especially when this current discussion of moving beyond that monitoring is also potentially being monitored
official involvement kind of defeats the purpose
no subject
no subject
i think having to read through all the mundane questions or hearing about everyones new pets and the party theyre hosting for whatever holiday is just the price of admission
if they want any legitimate information they should absolutely have to suffer every second of the rest
no subject
no subject
not that deflecting like this will necessarily throw them off, they may just start reading more closely for it. ]
or she
but i suppose you are right
we are a tediously dull group on the whole arent we
even our dramatics generally fit predictable patterns
at least a soap opera is only an hours watching per day
how much time must one have to spend to get through all of the activity one the network in any day
with the patience necessary for it i have no doubt in my mind they must be the true heroes
it is only to keep us safe after all right
[ so maybe she's laying it on a little thick. ]
no subject
no subject
with the right motivation of course
im sure that sort of help could get one a very handsome reward from the parties who would benefit from it
no subject
no subject
we certainly wouldnt want to risk theyre employment with the sharing of any sensitive information
no subject
But we definitely want them to maintain their job. We're just those spunky imPorts, after all.
no subject
we just want everything to be nice and friendly
certainly nothings friendlier than a little bonus income