nastygram: (C:\livelock)
darlene. ([personal profile] nastygram) wrote in [community profile] maskormenace2017-05-08 08:14 pm

video | anonymous

[The video, when it begins, is on a loop: three minute segments of anonymous space, with a steady stream of white noise.

The white noise continues until, eventually, it is broken by a voice thick with electronic distortion.]


Hello, imPorts.

The natives here are more than happy to believe that their government is looking out for their best interest. The same cannot be said for us, the imPorts: we who were dragged here from our homes, assigned houses, powers, jobs. Categorized, classified, tracked, yes, and monitored, paid off within a meager system of incentivization and reward, motivated by our own complacency to both sit down and shut up. From the dawn of imPort history it has been left up to us, the imPorts, to figure out this whole new life beneath these new and foreign stars. And does the government care? No. Not as long as you follow their rules. Do they care about our best interests? No. They only care that we abide by their rules.

We are the Constellation, and we are here to tell you that we do not believe in these rules. We have been hard at work figuring out our new lives, for you. And we have found that while we were busy not trusting the government--they have been just as busy not trusting us.

We, the imPorts, are not favored children. We, the imPorts, are not cherished heroes. We are the ones who are watched, always, by the most fixed and sleepless and critical of eyes.

We have a list, imPorts, a list that we are leaking to you now, live, for your perusal and your understanding.

Fuu Hououji. Commander Shepherd. Lucifer. Jacob Taylor. L'Arachel. Daisy Johnson. Count Dooku. The Doctor.

This, fellow imPorts, is a watch list. A list of your brothers and sisters who the government deemed watchworthy. People of interest. Some of them are still with us. Some of them are gone. And whether or not any of these people are worthily deemed dangerous, we want you, the people, to know: this is what happens when you go against the grain. Labeled as agents opposed. Granted their freedom under secret scrutiny. Catch, and tag, and release.

To those who will, inevitably, dismiss this list as inconsequential: stay tuned. This is not the only list.
And this will not be our one and only release to you, our public.

Remember: the only power that we have, imPorts, is the power that we give to ourselves. The only limits to that power are the limits that we allow. Do not forget this. Consider yourselves warned.

[The video of space continues for another minute after the voice ends. The volume of the white noise increases until it is, abruptly, cut off with a burst of static.]



[as per last year's watch list.]
slightlyoffchilt: (Gasconading.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-12 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
Now that is the anonymous reporting I want to see. Rank your imPorts.
slightlyoffchilt: (Scope.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-13 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
[Oh, Darlene. If only he knew.]

Just an idea. I am, of course, only trying to help.

Take it from an expert: the best way to dissuade the sort of skepticism you are seeing here, dear anonymous, is to make them put skin in the game. And nothing is quite as thin-skinned as ego.
slightlyoffchilt: (Maverick.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-16 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
A tip: snark at the expense of your own intelligence does not inspire confidence.
Edited 2017-05-16 01:46 (UTC)
slightlyoffchilt: (Obviate.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-18 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Now I am convinced that it was not.

Great at making friends, aren't you?
slightlyoffchilt: (Informative.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-26 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
Consider reconsidering, perhaps. You would be more successful in your endeavors.

Hard to network when everyone finds you distasteful or unsympathetic.
slightlyoffchilt: (Panegyric.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-26 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
Emotions, especially positive ones, are easier to persuade (in most cases, for most people) than that of logos.

No matter how much you would rather it be otherwise.
slightlyoffchilt: (Debel)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-26 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
A gross misunderstanding. I will break it down.

You cannot enlighten if they will not listen. They will not listen if they cannot trust you.

You come across as untrustworthy.
Edited 2017-05-26 04:56 (UTC)
slightlyoffchilt: (Toast.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-05-27 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Out of the kindness of my heart.
slightlyoffchilt: (Objurgate.)

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2017-06-02 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
Well, I am afraid you would not be interested in my other methods engaged to sweeten deals.

[Sex joke.]

So let us say that the offer stands, and you probably know how to hunt me down if you change your mind.