Skip to Main Content
"Rosa Diaz" (
pop_of_color
) wrote in
maskormenace
2017
-
10
-
10
03:56 pm
Entry tags:
padmé amidala | senator
,
† alphonse elric | n/a
,
† daryl dixon | the angel
,
† duo maxwell jr. | warlock
,
† gabrielle lancret | cinders
,
† k-2so | n/a
,
† magnus chase | n/a
,
† rosa diaz | espada de muerte
,
† sadie doyle | n/a
[text]
how many bikes is too many bikes? three? ten?
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 09:18 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
none since moving here.
had 1 back home.
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-10 09:19 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Then how many are you
planning
on getting?
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 09:20 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
why do you think i'm fucking asking this question in the first place
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-10 09:21 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
If I said three, then what?
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 09:43 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
seems reasonable
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-10 09:44 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Five?
Edited
2017-10-10 21:44 (UTC)
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 09:45 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
also reasonable
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-10 09:46 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Ten.
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 09:48 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
fucking reasonable
and now un: k-2so
reexamined
2017-10-10 09:49 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
That's not reasonable at all. What's the point in asking if you think any amount is a reasonable amount?
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 09:50 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
oh it's you
great
that's why i asked. because 10 seems fucking reasonable. would've figured a fucking robot would get basic things like this.
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-10 10:01 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
And I'm telling you it isn't. Ten is not reasonable. Neither is five. Three is getting there, but still a borderline ridiculous amount.
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 10:03 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
it would be to a robot.
i mean, can't you just like morph yourself into a bike or something
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-10 10:07 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
It's an unreasonable amount to anyone, organic or synthetic. No one needs that many motorcycles.
And no, I can't, and I have no idea where you got that idea from.
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-10 10:09 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
most people are too scared shitless to get on one, that's why. and it's fucking dumb.
also that sucks. seems like a pretty cool ability to have.
i met another robot who could do shit like that.
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-11 01:58 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Even among most motorcycle owners, I would bet that they would find the ownership of more than three motorcycles unnecessary.
What other robot?
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-11 02:29 am (UTC)
(
link
)
threatened to throw me into space or some shit. wouldn't stop talking about how i didn't care for like, weeks.
there's a dude jay leno in my universe who owns like fucking 40 cars or whatever. that shit is unnecessary. three bikes? not so bad
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-11 03:33 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Sounds like Riptide.
I agreed that three was not so bad, just
borderline
ridiculous.
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-11 08:35 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
sounds right
got a feeling you think most human shit is ridiculous
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-11 08:55 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Your feeling is correct, and you know I'm not wrong.
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-12 01:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
never said you were
probably the 1 thing we completely agree on
humans suck
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-12 02:45 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Yes, we ought to just have robots run everything. That way, no one has an improper amount of motorcycles.
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-12 04:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
fuck you
no such thing as an improper amount unless someone's letting them rust and rot
like a stupid robot
no subject
reexamined
2017-10-12 12:23 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
So, verifying: humans suck, but robots are also stupid?
no subject
pop_of_color
2017-10-14 09:58 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
some of them yeah
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 03:45 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 05:11 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 05:16 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 05:17 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 05:22 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 05:25 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 05:42 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 05:44 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 05:51 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 05:53 (UTC)
-
Expand
1/2
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:10 (UTC)
-
Expand
2/3 actually
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:10 (UTC)
-
Expand
3/4 ACTUALLY
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:10 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:12 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 06:15 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:28 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 06:29 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:31 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 06:32 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-15 06:35 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-15 06:36 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-18 02:15 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-24 18:51 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-24 21:32 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-25 02:21 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-26 02:46 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-26 21:29 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-26 21:41 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-30 00:06 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-30 19:48 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-30 21:10 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-10-30 21:13 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-10-30 23:44 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-01 21:35 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-02 17:28 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-02 17:33 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-02 17:36 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-02 17:38 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-02 19:18 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-02 19:30 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-02 20:25 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-02 20:59 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-03 01:48 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-12 21:44 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-14 22:32 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-15 17:15 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-15 21:59 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-15 22:30 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-16 22:33 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-17 13:59 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
pop_of_color
-
2017-11-20 22:03 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
reexamined
-
2017-11-21 22:11 (UTC)
-
Expand
359 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
had 1 back home.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
and now un: k-2so
no subject
great
that's why i asked. because 10 seems fucking reasonable. would've figured a fucking robot would get basic things like this.
no subject
no subject
i mean, can't you just like morph yourself into a bike or something
no subject
And no, I can't, and I have no idea where you got that idea from.
no subject
also that sucks. seems like a pretty cool ability to have.
i met another robot who could do shit like that.
no subject
What other robot?
no subject
there's a dude jay leno in my universe who owns like fucking 40 cars or whatever. that shit is unnecessary. three bikes? not so bad
no subject
I agreed that three was not so bad, just borderline ridiculous.
no subject
got a feeling you think most human shit is ridiculous
no subject
no subject
probably the 1 thing we completely agree on
humans suck
no subject
no subject
no such thing as an improper amount unless someone's letting them rust and rot
like a stupid robot
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
2/3 actually
3/4 ACTUALLY
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)