ᴘsychopomp 💀 (
glowsferatu) wrote in
maskormenace2015-03-13 11:12 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
007 ♍ video ♍ backdated to early afternoon
[ it's been a while since kanaya has been on video, and a while since she's felt presentable enough to be. but here, in whatever office she's working in, she seems to have taken all the necessary effort, pink lipstick and earrings to match her ever-inexplicable reading glasses. visible signs of guilt have never been her style, too much a ploy for attention. too pitiful. she's stable enough now to not make that mistake again.
never one to waste time not multitasking, even while she speaks, she's shuffling and organizing a stack of papers. desk work may be a little dull, but at least it's legal and safe. ]
I suppose recent events demand an accounting of the truth, some settling of where exactly it lies. And that file that was leaked about me, of course, is all true. The bit about Hobgoblin is no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention, but the multiple murders? Yes, that also was me.
And I stand by each of them, bereft of context as they are. I'm not the sort who'd only talk about the morals behind it, after all. I'm not here to defend myself, either. That the information was publicized is one matter, but I think the why of it is more important to discuss.
[ she doesn't stop shuffling papers, but she moves her main focus to the camera, only glancing down every now and then to what she's doing, to make sure it's being sorted correctly. ]
It's easy to point the finger at the Hornets. They were the instigating factor, of course, spreading whatever mental infection they'd concocted to act through us as their agents. It's what they did that had me railing against us, both through physical action and the propagation of an agenda to establish the danger imPort powers presents. [ conveniently, or perhaps loyally, leaving out inumuta's name. if people know, they know, but she doesn't have to drag his name through the mud alongside her. ] Not something I'd have chosen to do, an yet, it happened. But, here on the other side, left to my own thoughts without anyone else's encroaching them, I have to wonder. Didn't they have something of a point?
As imPorts, we are a gun that is not only loaded, but recently found smoking. Certainly, the government can advocate as they like, say that we were victims just the same as anyone on the other end of that gun, but I think that insults those endangered by our proximity. We are dangerous, and simply because we hesitate to pull that trigger ourselves, that doesn't mean it isn't possible for another to pull it for us. Something must be done for that.
[ she puts a halt to her paper pushing, knitting her fingers under her chin. this part is important, and she wants them to know it. she isn't here to argue, not today, so if she can reduce the arguments with a few words, she can hopefully avoid them. ]
Now, in order to properly address what I am saying, let's first get out of the way what I'm not. The Hornets weren't right, there is a difference between being right and having a point. They were just as dangerous to this world and its people as we are, and perhaps more so, for their willingness to fire the weapon regardless of the damage. They lacked the self awareness to recognize their own toxicity, which is where we must be better than them.
[ she spreads her hands, braking their clasp. ] I'm also not saying that mandatory nullification should be initiated across the board. Not now that I'm speaking clearly and singularly, at least. Nick Alford felt otherwise, but...extremities of that sort are hardly the first place to leap to. But I do believe some oversight is necessary, and I no more trust the government's capability nor willingness than I did when I first registered. Less so, if anything, with their response to recent matters.
We have to be better. We have to find true, solid solutions to promise we will be better. This is something we should be considering and discussing. Even if the blame isn't necessarily ours, the responsibility for addressing the aftermath is. We're meant to be populated with a number of brilliant minds, why not put them to use?
[ resting her chin in one hand, she props an elbow up on the desk, staring off thoughtfully. ] Maybe some kind of defense against mental compromise, [ she taps a finger against her temple. ] that would be a good first step. Just don't make it ugly.
[ she takes a moment to reexamine her papers, then reaches over to shut off the recording before continuing. ]
never one to waste time not multitasking, even while she speaks, she's shuffling and organizing a stack of papers. desk work may be a little dull, but at least it's legal and safe. ]
I suppose recent events demand an accounting of the truth, some settling of where exactly it lies. And that file that was leaked about me, of course, is all true. The bit about Hobgoblin is no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention, but the multiple murders? Yes, that also was me.
And I stand by each of them, bereft of context as they are. I'm not the sort who'd only talk about the morals behind it, after all. I'm not here to defend myself, either. That the information was publicized is one matter, but I think the why of it is more important to discuss.
[ she doesn't stop shuffling papers, but she moves her main focus to the camera, only glancing down every now and then to what she's doing, to make sure it's being sorted correctly. ]
It's easy to point the finger at the Hornets. They were the instigating factor, of course, spreading whatever mental infection they'd concocted to act through us as their agents. It's what they did that had me railing against us, both through physical action and the propagation of an agenda to establish the danger imPort powers presents. [ conveniently, or perhaps loyally, leaving out inumuta's name. if people know, they know, but she doesn't have to drag his name through the mud alongside her. ] Not something I'd have chosen to do, an yet, it happened. But, here on the other side, left to my own thoughts without anyone else's encroaching them, I have to wonder. Didn't they have something of a point?
As imPorts, we are a gun that is not only loaded, but recently found smoking. Certainly, the government can advocate as they like, say that we were victims just the same as anyone on the other end of that gun, but I think that insults those endangered by our proximity. We are dangerous, and simply because we hesitate to pull that trigger ourselves, that doesn't mean it isn't possible for another to pull it for us. Something must be done for that.
[ she puts a halt to her paper pushing, knitting her fingers under her chin. this part is important, and she wants them to know it. she isn't here to argue, not today, so if she can reduce the arguments with a few words, she can hopefully avoid them. ]
Now, in order to properly address what I am saying, let's first get out of the way what I'm not. The Hornets weren't right, there is a difference between being right and having a point. They were just as dangerous to this world and its people as we are, and perhaps more so, for their willingness to fire the weapon regardless of the damage. They lacked the self awareness to recognize their own toxicity, which is where we must be better than them.
[ she spreads her hands, braking their clasp. ] I'm also not saying that mandatory nullification should be initiated across the board. Not now that I'm speaking clearly and singularly, at least. Nick Alford felt otherwise, but...extremities of that sort are hardly the first place to leap to. But I do believe some oversight is necessary, and I no more trust the government's capability nor willingness than I did when I first registered. Less so, if anything, with their response to recent matters.
We have to be better. We have to find true, solid solutions to promise we will be better. This is something we should be considering and discussing. Even if the blame isn't necessarily ours, the responsibility for addressing the aftermath is. We're meant to be populated with a number of brilliant minds, why not put them to use?
[ resting her chin in one hand, she props an elbow up on the desk, staring off thoughtfully. ] Maybe some kind of defense against mental compromise, [ she taps a finger against her temple. ] that would be a good first step. Just don't make it ugly.
[ she takes a moment to reexamine her papers, then reaches over to shut off the recording before continuing. ]
video
I know that "no" is the answer you have beneath your aim, but I'm not actually confident that it's the correct answer. Has anyone yet stood against us successfully?
While they haven't, we can't really call that everyone. But I do agree that imPort crime is probably better prioritized over native crime. The problem being there are more imPort "heroes" than criminals.
For the lot of them, you couldn't pry their practice from their rigor mortised hands. As though it, and the powers they've been granted, are some unalienable and sacred right.
video
As long as they're not using their powers to bully people, I certainly haven't got any problem with them thinking about things that way. But it seems like the strong do end up bullying the weak quite a lot. Which...I guess that's just what I worry about. If we make some sort of system that would protect that sort of thing, it could result in quite a lot of nastiness.
video
If we make a system for any purpose, it should be to keep the strong in check.
video
video
video
So...How do we keep them in check, then? I mean, honestly - that runs the risk of swinging too far the opposite direction, doesn't it? If you strip people of their freedoms, they start getting resentful. And resentment builds up over time. I know in my world, that's resulted in a lot of unpleasantness, no less than the strong oppressing the weak.
[ And, for what it's worth - ]
Which isn't a criticism of your idea. At all. That's just me being frustrated over the fact that it seems like there aren't any right answers, ever, in any world ever.
video
[ which isn't to say she wouldn't advocate stripping more freedoms, or just things that are taken for granted as freedoms, but she's trying to be evenhanded. she doesn't care to hear all the whining she'd get if she said everything she really thinks. ]
What did you think I was suggesting?
video
Whenever you restrict someone's ability to do what they want to - including to others - that's taking away freedom. Generally, that's a good sort of freedom to take away, sure. But I've known people who were furious that the government wouldn't let them kill people.
[ Revolutions take all kinds. Including idiot anarchists. ]
video
There's no helping entitled morons, I suppose. Those are the sort who are most in need of being leashed, I think. There's always some trouble they'll bring up, especially if they're vouching for a freedom that will only cause suffering to others.
video
[ A sigh. ]
I do not have the patience to be a political thinker, honestly. I don't understand how others are able to do it.
video
Letting your blood run hot and banishing systems you disapprove of is all well and good, but someone has to be there to see to the vacuum it leaves. Someone has to consider the consequences.
I'd hate to have it left to the wrong sort of someone.
video
The sorts of people who see a necessity for a new system, though, and the sorts of people who are willing to tear it down - they're not necessarily the same sorts of people as those who know how to build up a new system, though. Yeah, someone's got to be there, and someone's got to see to the consequences, but the people who can do that probably aren't going to be the same people who tear a bad system down.
video
You may not understand how one could cultivate that patience, but I'm sure you must understand why you'll need someone with that patience in your alignment.
video
I do have experience. With the whole process of changing regimes. So...Yeah, I understand.
video
Do you?
Every indication you've given, since first arrival, implies that the only experience you have is with the initial stages. Not actually tearing down the old regime, but just planning it. It's really the only facet of the process I've ever heard you address.
video
[ And then she lifts her eyebrows, just a touch, and says - again, more gently than anything else, not in an effort to scold Kanaya as much as to just assert her own self-assurance and self-confidence: ]
I've been at this for six years. I'd have to be awfully thick not to have spent any of that time considering what's got to come after my part's done.
video
Well, when you tell me you don't understand something, I'm not going to be certain of the extent of it. Best to cover one's bases.
Still, knowing your strengths and your limitations, those are always commendable qualities. They are prudent to recognize, in a coalition like that. [ this is her trying to be nice, trying to counter all those times she's called her stupid with a recognition of something that most certainly isn't.
she's trying, at least. ]
video
Too right it's prudent. Especially since I'm quite certain that some of my ideas are really going to move us forward in terms of actual progress. But afterwards, if I got shut up indoors day after day in some council I'd probably end up strangling our new prime minister in frustration and that would probably end up undoing everything I did to help.
video
it may only be a small step, but it is in fact a step. ]
That would be something to be careful about. Before you knew it, you might have someone else following in your footsteps, talking about how a new revolution is needed.
video
Well, we might end up being quite shitty at what we do, in which case that'll be their right, I think.
[ Then, with less humor: ] I mean, that's to be expected, though, isn't it. It's how the world's gone, time and again - revolution to counter-revolution, the growth of empires followed by their decline and fall, which leaves a vacuum for the next one. The history of the world can be traced like the tides, every turn marked by the ebbing and flowing of power. What I want is to cut a new channel for those tides. To set some example of a revolution fought with fewer lives lost. With less reliance on slavery and on coercion. So that maybe in the years to come, the turns of power that follow will be gentler as well. So that the revolutionary that kicks my government out of power does so with a vote and a coalition instead of with a murder. And so that the government that they build gives a voice to the people - and spirits - who can't just force others to listen.
video
Maybe their dissatisfaction stems from the fact that you did anything at all.
video
Oh, well. ]
Well, if it happens, that may well be a reason. But I think that we might be getting a little bit far ahead of ourselves, since we haven't even had the coup yet, let alone a counter-coup.
video
she can't imagine anyone in power simply stepping aside when that power becomes damaging, especially giving the sort of reasons that generally happens. the best way to prevent bloodshed, in her mind, is to find a way to keep the revolution from being necessary, and that depends on whoever's already on the throne. ]
Of course. But even planning the coup for another world is getting a bit ahead as well, I think. You'd first need to ensure that those memories can cross the dimensional threshold.
video
Maybe.
[ But: ]
But if I can't have something to look forward to, I'll go mad. Or lose all hope. I'm not sure which would be worse. So anticipating endless squabbling does nothing for my motivation. Looking forward to breaking their power and freeing their slaves, on the other hand...That can keep me going.
video
It's a crutch more than anything. A blinder to reality.
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
Re: video
video