ᴘsychopomp 💀 (
glowsferatu) wrote in
maskormenace2015-03-13 11:12 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
007 ♍ video ♍ backdated to early afternoon
[ it's been a while since kanaya has been on video, and a while since she's felt presentable enough to be. but here, in whatever office she's working in, she seems to have taken all the necessary effort, pink lipstick and earrings to match her ever-inexplicable reading glasses. visible signs of guilt have never been her style, too much a ploy for attention. too pitiful. she's stable enough now to not make that mistake again.
never one to waste time not multitasking, even while she speaks, she's shuffling and organizing a stack of papers. desk work may be a little dull, but at least it's legal and safe. ]
I suppose recent events demand an accounting of the truth, some settling of where exactly it lies. And that file that was leaked about me, of course, is all true. The bit about Hobgoblin is no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention, but the multiple murders? Yes, that also was me.
And I stand by each of them, bereft of context as they are. I'm not the sort who'd only talk about the morals behind it, after all. I'm not here to defend myself, either. That the information was publicized is one matter, but I think the why of it is more important to discuss.
[ she doesn't stop shuffling papers, but she moves her main focus to the camera, only glancing down every now and then to what she's doing, to make sure it's being sorted correctly. ]
It's easy to point the finger at the Hornets. They were the instigating factor, of course, spreading whatever mental infection they'd concocted to act through us as their agents. It's what they did that had me railing against us, both through physical action and the propagation of an agenda to establish the danger imPort powers presents. [ conveniently, or perhaps loyally, leaving out inumuta's name. if people know, they know, but she doesn't have to drag his name through the mud alongside her. ] Not something I'd have chosen to do, an yet, it happened. But, here on the other side, left to my own thoughts without anyone else's encroaching them, I have to wonder. Didn't they have something of a point?
As imPorts, we are a gun that is not only loaded, but recently found smoking. Certainly, the government can advocate as they like, say that we were victims just the same as anyone on the other end of that gun, but I think that insults those endangered by our proximity. We are dangerous, and simply because we hesitate to pull that trigger ourselves, that doesn't mean it isn't possible for another to pull it for us. Something must be done for that.
[ she puts a halt to her paper pushing, knitting her fingers under her chin. this part is important, and she wants them to know it. she isn't here to argue, not today, so if she can reduce the arguments with a few words, she can hopefully avoid them. ]
Now, in order to properly address what I am saying, let's first get out of the way what I'm not. The Hornets weren't right, there is a difference between being right and having a point. They were just as dangerous to this world and its people as we are, and perhaps more so, for their willingness to fire the weapon regardless of the damage. They lacked the self awareness to recognize their own toxicity, which is where we must be better than them.
[ she spreads her hands, braking their clasp. ] I'm also not saying that mandatory nullification should be initiated across the board. Not now that I'm speaking clearly and singularly, at least. Nick Alford felt otherwise, but...extremities of that sort are hardly the first place to leap to. But I do believe some oversight is necessary, and I no more trust the government's capability nor willingness than I did when I first registered. Less so, if anything, with their response to recent matters.
We have to be better. We have to find true, solid solutions to promise we will be better. This is something we should be considering and discussing. Even if the blame isn't necessarily ours, the responsibility for addressing the aftermath is. We're meant to be populated with a number of brilliant minds, why not put them to use?
[ resting her chin in one hand, she props an elbow up on the desk, staring off thoughtfully. ] Maybe some kind of defense against mental compromise, [ she taps a finger against her temple. ] that would be a good first step. Just don't make it ugly.
[ she takes a moment to reexamine her papers, then reaches over to shut off the recording before continuing. ]
never one to waste time not multitasking, even while she speaks, she's shuffling and organizing a stack of papers. desk work may be a little dull, but at least it's legal and safe. ]
I suppose recent events demand an accounting of the truth, some settling of where exactly it lies. And that file that was leaked about me, of course, is all true. The bit about Hobgoblin is no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention, but the multiple murders? Yes, that also was me.
And I stand by each of them, bereft of context as they are. I'm not the sort who'd only talk about the morals behind it, after all. I'm not here to defend myself, either. That the information was publicized is one matter, but I think the why of it is more important to discuss.
[ she doesn't stop shuffling papers, but she moves her main focus to the camera, only glancing down every now and then to what she's doing, to make sure it's being sorted correctly. ]
It's easy to point the finger at the Hornets. They were the instigating factor, of course, spreading whatever mental infection they'd concocted to act through us as their agents. It's what they did that had me railing against us, both through physical action and the propagation of an agenda to establish the danger imPort powers presents. [ conveniently, or perhaps loyally, leaving out inumuta's name. if people know, they know, but she doesn't have to drag his name through the mud alongside her. ] Not something I'd have chosen to do, an yet, it happened. But, here on the other side, left to my own thoughts without anyone else's encroaching them, I have to wonder. Didn't they have something of a point?
As imPorts, we are a gun that is not only loaded, but recently found smoking. Certainly, the government can advocate as they like, say that we were victims just the same as anyone on the other end of that gun, but I think that insults those endangered by our proximity. We are dangerous, and simply because we hesitate to pull that trigger ourselves, that doesn't mean it isn't possible for another to pull it for us. Something must be done for that.
[ she puts a halt to her paper pushing, knitting her fingers under her chin. this part is important, and she wants them to know it. she isn't here to argue, not today, so if she can reduce the arguments with a few words, she can hopefully avoid them. ]
Now, in order to properly address what I am saying, let's first get out of the way what I'm not. The Hornets weren't right, there is a difference between being right and having a point. They were just as dangerous to this world and its people as we are, and perhaps more so, for their willingness to fire the weapon regardless of the damage. They lacked the self awareness to recognize their own toxicity, which is where we must be better than them.
[ she spreads her hands, braking their clasp. ] I'm also not saying that mandatory nullification should be initiated across the board. Not now that I'm speaking clearly and singularly, at least. Nick Alford felt otherwise, but...extremities of that sort are hardly the first place to leap to. But I do believe some oversight is necessary, and I no more trust the government's capability nor willingness than I did when I first registered. Less so, if anything, with their response to recent matters.
We have to be better. We have to find true, solid solutions to promise we will be better. This is something we should be considering and discussing. Even if the blame isn't necessarily ours, the responsibility for addressing the aftermath is. We're meant to be populated with a number of brilliant minds, why not put them to use?
[ resting her chin in one hand, she props an elbow up on the desk, staring off thoughtfully. ] Maybe some kind of defense against mental compromise, [ she taps a finger against her temple. ] that would be a good first step. Just don't make it ugly.
[ she takes a moment to reexamine her papers, then reaches over to shut off the recording before continuing. ]
video
video
Either way, they are no better equipped for it now than they were at that time.
video
We can't exactly take matters into our own hands, though, can we?
video
But imPorts as a whole, that's another matter entirely.
video
What - we set up our own little government, then? Set up a court? Hold trials? Punish people?
video
Not quite what I'm getting at. More that...we discover measures to prevent this recurring. Better organize ourselves to respond, when things get out of hand.
I don't know how much we can expect anything better from a corrective system.
video
I guess...Yeah. That makes sense. Though we've got to be careful.
video
video
Yeah. I know history well enough to know that this is how it happens, time and again. Strong people, people of talent and often people of good intentions get together and decide that the weaker, less talented people are having trouble governing themselves. They decide that for the good of the country, they should see to that, that they should protect them. And then those good intentions of protection turn into injustice, oppression, and authoritarianism.
video
Likewise, we're also the ones they're most likely to need protection against. None of this is to say we shouldn't be wary of anyone trying to gain power on the grounds you outline, [ the name "mitchell hundred" runs through her mind. ] but it's certainly not in line with anything with what I'm proposing here.
video
No. Not in what you're saying right now. But it's an easy escalation, isn't it? Especially given how keen everyone is to fight non-imPort crime. We start by governing ourselves, then look to the non-imPort criminals running loose and decide to expand our power just a little bit. And is there anyone who could stand against us, really?
video
I know that "no" is the answer you have beneath your aim, but I'm not actually confident that it's the correct answer. Has anyone yet stood against us successfully?
While they haven't, we can't really call that everyone. But I do agree that imPort crime is probably better prioritized over native crime. The problem being there are more imPort "heroes" than criminals.
For the lot of them, you couldn't pry their practice from their rigor mortised hands. As though it, and the powers they've been granted, are some unalienable and sacred right.
video
As long as they're not using their powers to bully people, I certainly haven't got any problem with them thinking about things that way. But it seems like the strong do end up bullying the weak quite a lot. Which...I guess that's just what I worry about. If we make some sort of system that would protect that sort of thing, it could result in quite a lot of nastiness.
video
If we make a system for any purpose, it should be to keep the strong in check.
video
video
video
So...How do we keep them in check, then? I mean, honestly - that runs the risk of swinging too far the opposite direction, doesn't it? If you strip people of their freedoms, they start getting resentful. And resentment builds up over time. I know in my world, that's resulted in a lot of unpleasantness, no less than the strong oppressing the weak.
[ And, for what it's worth - ]
Which isn't a criticism of your idea. At all. That's just me being frustrated over the fact that it seems like there aren't any right answers, ever, in any world ever.
video
[ which isn't to say she wouldn't advocate stripping more freedoms, or just things that are taken for granted as freedoms, but she's trying to be evenhanded. she doesn't care to hear all the whining she'd get if she said everything she really thinks. ]
What did you think I was suggesting?
video
Whenever you restrict someone's ability to do what they want to - including to others - that's taking away freedom. Generally, that's a good sort of freedom to take away, sure. But I've known people who were furious that the government wouldn't let them kill people.
[ Revolutions take all kinds. Including idiot anarchists. ]
video
There's no helping entitled morons, I suppose. Those are the sort who are most in need of being leashed, I think. There's always some trouble they'll bring up, especially if they're vouching for a freedom that will only cause suffering to others.
video
[ A sigh. ]
I do not have the patience to be a political thinker, honestly. I don't understand how others are able to do it.
video
Letting your blood run hot and banishing systems you disapprove of is all well and good, but someone has to be there to see to the vacuum it leaves. Someone has to consider the consequences.
I'd hate to have it left to the wrong sort of someone.
video
The sorts of people who see a necessity for a new system, though, and the sorts of people who are willing to tear it down - they're not necessarily the same sorts of people as those who know how to build up a new system, though. Yeah, someone's got to be there, and someone's got to see to the consequences, but the people who can do that probably aren't going to be the same people who tear a bad system down.
video
You may not understand how one could cultivate that patience, but I'm sure you must understand why you'll need someone with that patience in your alignment.
video
I do have experience. With the whole process of changing regimes. So...Yeah, I understand.
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
video
Re: video
video