magnitudes: (Default)
ѕarιѕѕa "noт тoday, ѕaтan" тнeron ([personal profile] magnitudes) wrote in [community profile] maskormenace2016-10-29 12:30 am

004.

( ooc: this is a pretty ridiculous post, but just chucking this behind a cut in case! Sarissa's kind of flippant and terrible sometimes, so I'm also gently linking an opt out post if there's any topics you'd sooner not come up, or would just prefer to opt out of cr with her generally :]b

content warning: discussion of cults, reference to serial killers, and potentially murder/group suicide/any else terrible that could tie into cults that could come up in the comments. I'll update as necessary. )



username: dropbears.


basically I've been told that unless I manage to successfully build a cult I'm inferior to alarming murderers

as such I'm doing some research into what would most appeal to my impending adoring followers
know a lot of you adore me anyway, but you know, gotta get those still on the fence to lean over this way some more

so

1. What would make you most likely to join a cult?
a — immortality
b — discounts
c — motivational speeches
d — free food
e — sugar gliders
f — other


2. What do you think is most important for an inspiring cult leader to have:
a — statues
b — a catch phrase
c — someone following them and djing a soundtrack to their life wherever they go
d — terrifying giant hair
e — sugar gliders
f — other


3. How do you feel about obeying my every instruction?
a — seriously though
b — don't do it
c — bad decision
d — really you'd regret it
e — sugar gliders
f — other


4. Isn't "The Cult" a 90s movie with witches?
a — no, that's the The Craft, go home
b — stop talking about the 1990s
c — stop talking about pop culture references that aren't from my world
d — my life is hard because I don't enjoy fun things
e — the sisterhood doesn't approve of this false coven
f — other


5. Sugar gliders?
a — all hail our marsupial overlords
b — amazing
c — amazing
d — amazing
e — my opinion is meaningless
f — other
slightlyoffchilt: (Gasconading.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-10-29 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I wouldn't shoot down the business card idea. A religion is arguably but a professional cult, why not shoot for the stars?

Even your sarcasm possesses charisma. I'm sticking to my theory. Perhaps your sisters would even allow me to expound upon the details of that theory -- but then again, I wouldn't want to invite too much skepticism when your cultish ambitions are still nascent.
slightlyoffchilt: (Parlous.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-10-31 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Who says that I'm flattering now? Perhaps these are simply my observations, forever documented on the Network. Historians will have to acknowledge your personal magnetism.

[He isn't going to kill his swooning words that quickly.]

Interesting -- like a honey trap of a cult. Replacing sexual desire with a philosophical one, of course. Unless it is also that kind of cult?
slightlyoffchilt: (Persuasion.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-11-01 04:21 pm (UTC)(link)
The novelty of a non-sexual cult would probably draw in a fresh breath of participants. People do get tired of seeing the same old, same old -- there is something to be said for trendsetting.

[A hipster cult is what he does not say, for all implications abound.]

But I do have a question: am I being lured in by such mention of your spanakopita as we speak? Could very well be an invitation employed by a cult master, I must beg for clarification.
slightlyoffchilt: (Jape.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-11-02 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
What, is spanakopita now for inner circle members only? Seems a bit heartless. I could very well be a starving man.

[Immediately he saw the flaws in that hypothetical. Then, as correction:]

A man starving for decent spanakopita.
slightlyoffchilt: (Incise.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-11-04 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
Are you implying that I'm simply waiting for the opportunity to witness such behavior? That I might even be provoking it?

[Because he absolutely was.]

That would be unethical. But thankfully, like you said, you are the benevolent sort. And pragmatic. Pragmatically benevolent? Is there a preferred order?

When will I get my spanakopita?
slightlyoffchilt: (Discernment.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-11-05 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly. [He is pretty sure that she's being sarcastic, but to address the matter would be like admitting he wasn't a fine, upstanding bloke. It was a sneaky predicament indeed.]

Fair point. If this were in fact some benevolent pragmatist test, you would have passed. Luckily for the both of us, not even psychiatry is that involved with pedantry -- yet. I think an expansion of the Myers-Briggs may be in order soon.

Heropa? Oh no, so far away. But do you know what Maurtia Falls desperately needs? A spanakopita shop. You'd have a monopoly. None would dare challenge your authority.
slightlyoffchilt: (Sere.)

text;

[personal profile] slightlyoffchilt 2016-11-06 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Pennsylvania is not fake England.

That would be Maine.